RESORPTION MECHANISM OF HYDROXYAPATITE AND SS-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE COATING ON TITANIUM SURFACE

Abstract

Beta–tricalciumphosphate(β-TCP)coatinglayerisknown to be resorbed much faster than hydroxyapatite(HA), however, there has been few reports explaining the exact mechanism until now. Therefore, we investigated whether the resorption mechanisms of these two compounds are same, if not, what is the difference.

Eighty titanium discs with 12mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness were coated with HA(n=40) or β-TCP(n=40) by dip and spin coating method. In each group, the specimens were divided into 2 subgroups respectively; Dissolution (D, n=20) group and Osteoclast culture (C, n=20) group. The coated discs in D group were immersed in the cell culture media for 5 days, whereas, in C group, osteoclast-like cells (5×103 cells/500μ), which were isolated form human giant cell tumor, were seeded on the specimens and cultured for 5 days. Cultured cells were defined as osteoclast by the determination of osteoclast marker (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, TRAP). After immersion or osteoclast culture, the dissolution characteristics of coating surface were observed using light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). And the area fraction of resorption lacunae formed by osteoclast was analyzed by image analysis to evaluate the activity of osteoclastic degradation.

After 5 days of dissolution, there were much more cracks and denuded areas in β-TCP coating compared to HA coating. In C group, the osteoclasts covering the coating layer were identified on LM and SEM images. Mean area fraction of resorption lacunae in HA-C group was 11.62%, which was significantly higher than that of 0.73% of β-TCP-C group (p=0.001).

We conclude that the resorption mechanism of HA and β-TCP coating layers was different each other in vitro study. The coated β-TCP was degraded mainly by dissolution and also tended to be separated from implant, on the other hand, the HA coating layer was resorbed by osteoclastic activity