Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: We compared the clinical and radiological results in patients under and over 40 years of age who had received a non-cemented alumina-alumina hip replacement.
Materials and Methods: We studied 337 Cerafit acetabular cups implanted in 4 hospitals in association with Multicone-Hydroxyapatite stems with alumina-alumina bearing surfaces. Group 1 consisted of 63 patients under 40 years of age and group 2 of 274 patients over 40 years of age. Mean follow-up was 59.0 months. Demographic data and clinical and radiological results of both groups were compared.
Results: There were no cases of primary arthritis in group 1, however severe hip dysplasia and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis were frequent (p< 0.001). Weight (p< 0.001) and degree of activity (p=0.003) were greater in group 2. Preoperative function (p=0.03) and mobility (p< 0.001) were worse in group 1. There were 3 cup revisions in group 1 and 4 (including an alumina breakage) in group 2. Survival with no revision due to any cause was 91.4+5.1% in group 1 and 97.0+ 1.1 in group 2 (p=0.4007). There were no noises. Clinical and radiological results were similar in both groups.
Discussion and Conclusions: Diagnoses were different in both groups, the younger patients were in worse conditions. In spite of these differences, the alumina-alumina prosthesis showed similar results in both groups in the medium term. Long-term follow-ups are necessary to confirm these results.
The abstracts were prepared by E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, Editor-in-Chief of the Spanish Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología). Correspondence should be addressed to him at: Sociedad Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, calle Fernández de los Ríos 108, 28015-Madrid, Spain
