Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SEALING THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING BONE MARROW STROMAL CELLS (BMSCS)



Abstract

Introduction: Aseptic loosening at the bone-implant interface of THA acetabular components is a significant cause of implant failure. This loosening has been attributed either to wear particle-induced osteolysis or to the effects of joint fluid-pressure. It may be possible to prevent the loosening of implants by improving fixation between the bone and implant, or promoting the growth of a biological bony seal, in order to prevent the influx of wear particles or pressurized joint fluid. Additionally in revision implants it is important to promote osseointegration in situations where bone stock may be limited. The hypothesis of this study was spraying autologous BMSCs in fibrin glue onto the surface of HA-coated acetabular components would increase bone formation around the implant and improve bone-implant contact.

Materials and Methods: Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest of six goats, and BMSCs isolated and expanded in vitro. 10 x 10e6 BMSCs were suspended in reconstituted thrombin pre-operatively. A standard posterior approach was used. The acetabular shell was then coated with 2 ml of fibrin glue, with (n=6) or without 10 x 10e6 autologous BMSCs (n=6), and the acetabular component impacted into position. Antibiotic and analgesic prophylaxes were carried out. All animals were weight bearing within 48 hours post-operatively. Walking and ground reaction forces were assessed pre-operatively, as well as 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Results were expressed as a percentage of force transmitted through the right leg versus the left leg. After 12 weeks, the acetabulae were retrieved, and processed for histology. The percentage of new bone around the cups was measured within 5 radial zones, using image analysis. Bone-implant contact was also analysed between the new bone and implant surface. Mann Whitney U test was used to show statistical significance.

Results: New bone formation in Zone 5 showed a significant increase in the BMSC group (71.97±10.91%), when compared to the controls (23.85±15.13%, p=0.028). The other zones did not show a significant difference. Overall new bone growth in the BMSC group was 30% greater than the control group (71.42±8.97% and 54.22±16.56%, respectively, p=0.58). Bone-implant contact was significantly improved in the BMSC group (20.03±4.64%), in contrast to the control group (13.71±8.32%, p=0.027). With regards to the force plate analysis, there was no significant difference in loading between groups at both 6 weeks (Controls-79.74±3.63%, BMSCs-59.39±9.33%, p=0.086) and 12 weeks (Controls-86.0%±2.85%, BMSCs-62.33±5.12%, p=0.055).

Discussion and Conclusions: In this study, overall bone growth was greater when cups were treated with BMSCs. Bone-implant contact was significantly improved as well. This study has clinical applications, as using MSCs in fibrin glue promotes a bony seal in contact with the implant which may prevent the migration of particles, or joint fluid, decreasing the likelihood of aseptic loosening of THAs, and improving their longevity. Also, this technique may improve fixation in situations where bone stock is reduced.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos A. Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Dept of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY