TREATMENT OF COMPLEX FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS: ORIF OR ARTHROPLASTY? LONGTERM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, NON RANDOMIZED, COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the presented study was to evaluate the longterm outcome of surgically treated complex fractures of the proximal humerus including fractures with initial humeral head ischemia. The study was focused on the assessment of the functional outcome as well as on the occurence of avascular necrosis.

Methods: 100 shoulders (98 patients/60y/21–88) with intracapsular fractures of the proximal humerus were included in a prospective surgical evaluation protocol (Binary [LEGO] description system: 48/100 4-, 46/100 3-, 6/100 2-fragment fractures). Humeral head perfusion was assessed intraoperatively by means of laser-Doppler flowmetry and borehole judgement. 51/100 fractures were treated with osteosynthesis (group A). 49/100 were treated with hemiarthroplasty (group B). In group A 41/51 heads were perfused at the index procedure (A1) and 10/51 were ischemic (A2). The patients were re-evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.0 years (3.3–7.3) using the Constant-Murley-Score (CMS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and conventional x-ray imaging.

Results: The median total CMS was 76 (37–98) in group A, 70 (39–84) (group B) (p=0.02). The median SSV was 92 (40–100) (group A) and 90 (40–100) in group B (p=0.93). In group A1 6/30 heads were structurally alterated but not collapsed; 4/30 were collapsed. In group A2 6/10 were structurally alterated but not collapsed; 3/10 were collapsed. The median CMS for patients without structural alterations was 80 (37–98), for those with structural alterations 84 (53–93) and for those with collapsed heads 63 (48–74). The median SSV was 95 (50–100), 92 (50–100) and 60 (40–80), respectively.

Conclusions: Revascularization of the humeral head after initial ischemia is possible and occured in 7/10 patients. Their functional results were comparable to those of patients with initially perfused heads. When feasible, osteosynthesis is a viable option even for ischemic heads. The indication for osteosynthesis should be weighed against the fact that Osteosynthesis and Arthroplasty showed comparable long-term results.