PULSE-LAVAGE, TROCHANTERIC SUCTION AND EARLY REDUCTION REDUCES THERMAL DAMAGE POTENTIAL DURING HIP RESURFACING

Abstract

Introduction: A major concern with cemented hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) femoral components is the thermal damage to femoral head during cement curing; this maybe linked to fracture (reported incidence ~2%) and early failure. We investigated the effect of a modifid surgical technique using pulse lavage, lesser trochanter suction and early reduction on the maximum temperature recorded in the femoral head during HRA, compared to manual lavage and reduction after cement curing.

Methods: Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) were given a dummy HRA procedure, during which a temperature probe was inserted into the femoral head and the measuring tip placed close to the reamed surface; the position of the probe was confirmed by inter-operative xray. Four subjects received a dummy HRA femoral component using manual lavage and Simplex cement. The implanted femur was kept dislocated until the cement cured. The implanted heads were then removed and sectioned to locate the temperature probes, the THR surgery was then performed. Five patients receiving a definitive HRA were also measured; for these subjects suction on the lesser trochanter was used, pulse lavage given for 30 seconds prior to cementing with Simplex, and pulse lavage of the femoral head for 2 minutes, applied 1 minute after cementing the femoral component. The implanted joint was then immediately reduced and a further two minutes of pulse lavage applied to the reduced joint. Temperatures were recorded until the cement finally cured. In every case the cement was hand mixed for 1 minute and the component implanted at 2 minutes 30 seconds after mixing began.

Results: Sectioning showed that probe tips were < 0.5mm from cement mantle. The maximum temperature recorded in the femoral head was significantly (p=0.014) greater for the manual technique, median value of 47.2°C (37.0 to 67.9°C), than for the pulse lavage technique, median value of 32.7°C (31.7 to 35.6°C).

Discussion: The results show that excessive bone temperatures can occur during hip resurfacing. Temperatures above 45°C kill bone cells, the manual technique may lead to substantial thermal necrosis. Technique modification, with the use of suction on the lesser trochanter, generous use of pulse-lavage and joint reduction prior to cement curing, significantly reduced the temperatures recorded. With the modified technique, the maximum temperatures were well below the threshold of thermal damage. This modified technique is recommended as the potential for thermal bone necrosis is significantly reduced.