Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPARISON OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DISPLACED CALCANEAL FRACTURES



Abstract

Introduction: The aim of our study was to assess any difference in outcome between non-surgical and surgical treatment of displaced calcaneal fractures.

Materials and Methods: We studied 40 patients between 2000 to 2005 with displaced calcaneal fractures. Patients with significant co-morbidities were excluded. Two groups of 14 patients, surgery vs. no surgery were compared for age, sex, length of follow-up, fracture type by Essex-Lopresti classification and SF-36 outcome score. The non-surgical group underwent treatment with rest, ice, compression, elevation and the surgical group underwent fixation with an AO calcaneal plate through an extended lateral approach.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the surgical and conservatively treated groups for age, sex, time since injury and fracture type according to Essex-Lopresti but a highly statistically significant difference in SF-36 outcomes between the two groups favouring surgically treated calcaneal fractures.

Summary: Displaced fractures of the calcaneum are a significant injury affecting patients general health. In the literature controversy exists as to whether operative or non-operative treatment is better for this type of fracture.

Conclusion: Although the numbers are small, our study favours operative intervention, if possible, for this controversial fracture.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.