MECHANICAL STRENGTH TESTING OF KNOTS AND SUTURES COMMONLY USED IN ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR SHOULDER STABILISATION

Abstract

Purpose of Study: To compare the mechanical performance of two commonly used arthroscopic slip knots with that of a hand tied control.

Methods: The arthroscopic slip knots assessed were the Duncan Loop (DL) and the Tautline Hitch (TLH), both of which were tied with arthroscopic knot pushers and secured with Three Reversing Hitches on Alternating Posts (RHAPs). These were compared with four hand tied throws of a squre knot. All three knots were tied using three different materials: number two Ethibond, number one PDS and number two Fiberwire. All knots were tied in a close loop configuration between two metal bars mounted on an Instron materials testing device and pulled apart to both clinical and ultimate failure. Clinical failure was defined as the force in Newtons (N) required to increase loop length by three millimetres, which equtes in vivo with a critical loss in apposition of repaired tissues. Ultimate failure was defined as the force in N resulting in complete slippage or breakage of the knot being tested. This study was different than those before it in that a much larger number of each knot/suture permutation was tested (thirty in each case) to give the study sufficient power to detect significant differences between the knots tested.

Results and Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it is our recommendation that an arthroscopic TLH slip knot secured with three RHAPs and tied using a number two Fiberwire suture be used to produce shoulder repairs that are equivalent if not superior to those achieved using open hand tied methods.