Abstract
Purpose: To biomechanically compare the stability provided by 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws versus that provided by 4, 3.5mm cortical screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures
Methods: We obtained 20 sawbone(solid polyurethane foam) blocks of dimensions 9x6.5x3.5cm. 10 of these blocks had a density of normal cancellous bone (20pcf) and 10 represented osteoporotic bone (10pcf). We created a depressed fracture(Schatzker type 3) using a coring saw. Each fracture had 4 depressed fragments, which were elevated and supported using either 2,6.5mm cancellous screws or 4, 3.5mm cortical screws. The fractures were loaded axially using the Lloyds materials testing machine. A force displacement curve was plotted. A depression of 5mm was considered to be failure.
Results: Osteoporotic model|The mean force needed to produce a depression of 5mm was 700.8N with the 4-screw construct and 512.4N with the 2 screw construct. This difference was significantly significant (p=0.007). |Non-osteoporotic model|The mean force requires to produce the same depression was 1878.2N with the 2-screw construct and 1938.2N with the 4 screw construct. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.42).
Conclusions: A raft of 4, 3.5 mm cortical screws was biomechanically stronger than 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws in resisting axial compression in the osteoporotic bone model. There was no significant difference in the 2 constructs in non-osteoporotic bone model.
Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada