Abstract
Introduction: Many designs exist for the femoral component of cemented total hip arthoplasty, but cemented acetabular cups are largely similar. All are essentially hemispheres, made of polyethylene. An important factor determining survival time of cemented implants is cement penetration into the surrounding bone. To ensure sufficient penetration, many surgeons remove the smooth subchondral bone in the acetabulum and drill anchoring holes. This may however weaken the bone. Larger cement pressure during setting will improve penetration. For an acetabular cup, fixation at the rim is most important to prevent loosening, and therefore cement pressure should be high at the rim. A spherical geometry is not ideal to ensure high rim cement pressures. Based on a computer model of cement pressure generation during cup insertion, we designed an improved geometry to ensure higher rim pressures. The aim of this study is to compare the fixation strength of this new design to a conventional design. The effect of the design change will be compared with that of drilling anchoring holes and removing subchondral bone.
Methods: From a larger stock of young bovine acetabula, 14 similarly sized specimens were chosen. Twelve were prepared for a factorial experiment with three factors, based on three cup designs (Ogee either with or without flange, DePuy, Leeds, and the alternative design), preservation or removal of subchondral bone, and presence or absence of anchoring holes. Depth, diameter and position of the anchoring holes were chosen to optimise fixation strength. Two were prepared for replicates of two experiments with the new design, both with sub-chondral bone removed. The order of the experiments was randomised. CMW-3 cement (CMW-DePuy, UK) was hand-mixed for one minute. After four minutes, it was packed in the acetabulum and pressurised for one minute. Then a cup was inserted and manual force applied until setting of the cement. Next, acetabulum and cup were mounted in a materials testing machine and torque applied to the cup until gross failure. Applied force and displacement were sampled into a computer, and used to determine maximum torque.
Results and Discussion: Analysis was done in two steps. First, two-way ANOVA of main effects plus first order interactions was performed. Anchoring holes significantly increased strength (41±8 vs. 114±9 Nm; p=0.004, mean±SEM). No significant effect of reaming or cup design was found. For all experiments, the conventional cups with or without flange behaved almost identical. In step two, these two variations were combined into one “conventional” group, and three-way ANOVA with interactions was performed. Significant interaction between all three factors was found (p=0.02). This indicates that one unique combination (new cup design in acetabula with subchondral bone removed and without anchoring holes) achieved a high average strength. Under these circumstances, the fixation strength of the new design (114±9 Nm) was equal to the overall average achieved with anchoring holes. On average, the new design also had significantly larger fixation strength than a conventional spherical design (95±5 vs. 69±4 Nm; p=0.009). These results justify further studies.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary of BORS, Division of Surgery & Oncology, Section of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School Tort Centre, Dundee, DD1 9SY.
