Abstract
Introduction Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has now become an accepted and widely used treatment for unicompartmental arthritis. Our unit has performed over 1000 UKRs in the past 22 years. The optimal mechanical design of the implant has yet to be determined.
Methods After gaining ethical approval a prospective randomised trial was commenced in 1999 to compare the 2–5 year results of a fixed bearing with a mobile bearing prosthesis. 104 knees in 91 patients underwent a UKR, the mean age of the group was 65 years and a mean weight of 80kg. 57 had a St Georg Sled fixed bearing prosthesis and 47 an unconstrained mobile bearing Oxford UKR. All were prospectively reviewed using the Oxford and Bristol Knee Scores.
Results All 104 knees have been reviewed at 2 years, with none lost to follow-up. 3 patients in the Oxford group suffered a dislocated meniscus and a further 4 required revision, as well as 3 in the St Georg Sled group. The overall function of the 2 groups was the same, but the Oxford mobile bearing group had significantly more persistent pain (p=0.013).
Conclusion The results in both groups were less satisfactory than previous series from this unit probably due to the efforts being made to use minimal incision. However the early complication rate was higher with the mobile bearing devise. This must be balanced against the possible better long-term survival.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
