Abstract
Introduction. There has been a recent major increase in the use of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) but few studies exist comparing its long term efficiency with total knee replacement (TKR)
Method. Ethical approval was obtained.
Between 1989 and 1992 a randomised prospective study was undertaken in which 102 cases adjudged suitable for UKR were allocated to receive either a St Georg Sled UKR or a Kinematic Modular TKR. Both cohorts had a median age of 68 and a similar sex distribution and preoperative knee score. Regular follow up has been maintained. As reported the early results favoured UKR. All cases have now been assessed after a minimum of 10 years using modified WOMAC, Oxford and Bristol Knee Scores (BKS) as well as radiographs.
Results. 28 cases had died with their knees known to be intact, 2 cases were untraceable. 33 knees in each group were reviewed. 3 in each group had been revised, no impending failures were identified on the radiographs.
At 10 years the UKR group had better Oxford and WOMAC scores as well as significantly more excellent results (19:14) and fewer fair and poor results on the BKS. Both groups averaged over 105′ of flexion but 61% of the UKR and only 15% of the TKR group had 120′ or more of flexion.
Conclusion. The faster rehabilitation and better early results with UKR are maintained for 10 years with few failures occurring. The average BKS of the UKR group only fell from 91 to 88 between 5 and 10 years suggesting minimal evidence of functional deterioration in either the prosthesis or the remainder of the joint.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
