Abstract
Introduction If an arthroplasty patient presents with wound breakdown, sinus formation or a hot, red, painful joint replacement the diagnosis of infection is relatively straightforward. However, most total joint replacement (TJR) infections present in an indolent fashion and are impossible to distinguish from aseptic loosening. It is imperative to know if pain in a TJR is due to infection to plan appropriate further management.
Methods In this prospective study of 204 patients we analysed the diagnostic accuracy of various tests for infection in the setting of TJR: Inflammatory Markers (CRP/ESR); Aspiration Microbiology; and the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) – a novel technique in this situation. We used internationally agreed criteria as the gold standard for infection. The patient was deemed to be infected if any of the following were found at the time of revision surgery: a sinus; frank pus in the wound; positive microbiology or positive histology on intra-operative specimens. The sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each test were calculated.
Results 52 patients with an original diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis were excluded, as histology may be inaccurate. Their results have been presented elsewhere. The results for the remaining 152 patients are: CRP > 20mg/l: Sens 77%; Spec 76%; PPV 49%; NPV 92%. ESR > 30 mm/hr: Sens 61%; Spec 86%; PPV 57%; NPV 87%. Aspiration Microbiology: Sens 80%; Spec 83%; PPV 71%; NPV 88%. PCR: Sens 71%; Spec 78%; PPV 43%; NPV 89%.
Findings and Conclusions Only a few of the patients with negative inflammatory markers later turned out to be infected. If the inflammatory markers were positive, there was roughly a 50/50 chance that the joint was infected. Positive aspiration microbiology was associated with underlying infection approximately 3 times out of every 4, and negative results were correct 9 times out of 10. PCR was no more accurate than existing tests.
We recommend that all patients with painful TJRs have inflammatory markers checked as a screening test – if negative then the clinician can be relatively reassured that the implant is not infected. If positive, further investigation should be undertaken. Joint aspiration for microbiology is currently the best available second line investigation.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
