Abstract
Primary hip arthroplasty performed through a mini incision ( less than 10 cm) should provide more comfortable postoperative period and faster rehabilitation.
After a long period of learning curve ( more than one hundred cases) and development of specific instruments, a prospective comparison between the standard approach technique (38 cases) and mini incision technique (41 cases) was performed. In all cases, the ABG II stem was implanted. It was uncemented in 76% of cases. As it is not randomised, there is a slight difference between the two groups in age (p = 0,03) and body mass index (p = 0,01).
The fonctional status was evaluated at the third and seventh post operative days and at the first and second post operative months. Pain relief (EVA score), total peri operative blood loss (OSTHEO study criteria) and radiologic implants positioning are mesured.
In this study, there was no major complication. There was one case of phlebitis in both groups. During the evaluation, there was no significant difference in the functional result. The post operative EVA pain score was not different. The mean total peri operative blood loss was 1025 ml in the standard approach group and 1164 ml in the mini incision approach group (p = 0,405). The radiologic evaluation showed no difference in the cup positioning. In the mini incision group, there was few cases of varus positioning of the ABG II stem (21% cases) but it was not significant.
Those results demonstrate the safety and the efficacy of the posterior mini incision approach. There is a need for a technical learning curve and a resonably incision sizing adapted for each patient. Under those conditions, we are able to achieve the same quality of implant positioning, which should provide the same long term result.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
