Abstract
Introduction and Aims: To determine whether sagittal laxity has an effect on functional outcome following posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacement using two differing tibial insert designs.
Method: Ninety-seven knees in 83 patients were reviewed clinically, radiologically and underwent KT1000 testing at minimum five-year follow-up post-TKA. Knee society, WOMAC and SF12 scores were calculated. The same femoral component (Duracon, Stryker) was used in all patients. Two differing tibial inserts were used (51 Condylar and 46 AP lipped).
Results: The two groups were comparable for age, sex, Charnley category and Body mass index. There was no significant difference in knee society score, WOMAC scores, SF12 scores, knee flexion, posterior tibial slope or KT1000 laxity measurements between the two groups. Total laxity measured by KT1000 was 5mm in the AP lipped group and 4mm in the condylar group. There was no correlation between anterior, posterior or total laxity and functional outcome as measured by WOMAC, KSS, SF12 or knee flexion.
Conclusion: Increased sagittal laxity does not have a strong influence on functional outcome following TKA. The differing tibial insert designs had no significant influence on laxity or function.
These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.
