Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CONTINUOUS COMPARTMENT PRESSURE MONITORING FOLLOWING ACUTE TIBIAL FRACTURE



Abstract

Introduction: The role of continuous compartment pressure monitoring to detect compartment syndrome associated with tibia fractures is unclear. Our study aims to assess the impact of continuous compartment pressure monitoring in patients with acute tibial fractures.

Method: A randomised controlled trial was performed on 200 consecutive extra-articular tibial shaft fractures presenting to a major metropolitan trauma centre between June 2000 and August 2003. One hundred patients were randomised to continuous compartment pressure monitoring of the anterior compartment for 36 hours. The other group received usual care. The surgical team was alerted if the compartment pressure was within 30mmHg of the diastolic blood pressure. Compartment syndrome was diagnosed on clinical grounds in alert patients. All cases of compartment syndrome were treated with fasciotomy. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of six months.

Result: During the study period, three patients presented with acute compartment syndrome and underwent immediate fasciotomy and, consequently, were not entered into the study. In several cases, monitoring revealed pressures within 30 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure, but compartment syndrome was excluded on clinical grounds. The two groups were comparable with regards to age, mechanism of injury and fracture classification. Of the 100 control fractures, there were three cases of compartment syndrome. Each underwent fasciotomy without significant sequelae. Of the 100 monitored fractures, no cases of compartment syndrome were diagnosed. There were no cases of missed compartment syndrome in this study. Continuous compartment pressure monitoring requires regular nurse education and, despite this, in most patients monitoring was not complete.

Conclusion: We did not find continuous compartment pressure monitoring useful in diagnosing compartment syndrome in patients with acute tibial fractures or preventing missed compartment syndrome. However, this study is underpowered to detect differences in missed compartment syndrome and it may be subject to trial bias as the level of awareness of compartment syndrome was raised by performing the trial. We no longer perform continuous compartment pressure monitoring at our institution.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

One or more of the listed authors are receiving or have received benefits or support from a recognised academic body for the pursuance of the study.