Abstract
Aim: To test the hypothesis that the meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs) make a significant contribution to resisting anteroposterior and rotatory laxity of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficient knee.
Methods: The anterior and posterior MFLs of eight cadaveric knees were identified using previously described dissection techniques [1], which were shown not to affect overall knee stability in control studies. These specimens were tested for anteroposterior and rotatory laxity in a materials testing machine. The posterior cruciate ligament was then divided, followed by division of the MFLs. Laxity results were obtained for intact, PCL-deficient and PCL/MFL-deficient knees. Results were analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance and paired t tests.
Results: Division of the MFLs in the PCL-deficient knee significantly increased posterior laxity between 15o and 90o of flexion (p< 0.01). Force/displacement measurements revealed that, at 90° flexion, the MFLs contributed to 28% of total resistance to posterior drawer in the intact knee and 70% in the PCL-deficient knee (p< 0.01). There was no effect on rotatory laxity (p> 0.2).
Discussion: Previous studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of the MFLs in knees1 and that these ligaments have a strength similar to the posterior fibre bundle of the PCL [2]. The current in vitro study suggests that they contribute to overall resistance to posterior drawer, especially in the PCL-deficient knee. If this is confirmed in vivo, patients with PCL injuries may have a reduced posterior drawer sign if their MFLs are intact, and this may result in a more stable knee. Thus the MFLs should be accurately identified and assessed during MRI scanning and arthroscopy [3].
Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating a function for the MFLs as secondary restraints to posterior drawer in the PCL-deficient knee. The integrity of these structures should be assessed during both MRI scanning and arthroscopy of PCL-injured patients, as this may affect the diagnosis and management of such injuries.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Smith. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the British Association for Surgery of the Knee, c/o BOA, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.
References:
1 Gupte CM, Smith A, McDermott ID, Thomas RD, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2002). Meniscofemoral ligaments revisited: anatomical study, age correlation and clinical implications. J Bone Joint Surg [B]84B: 846–851. Google Scholar
2 Gupte CM, Smith A, Jamieson N, Bull AMJ, Thomas RD,AmisAA (2002).Meniscofemoral Ligaments- structural and material properties. J Biomech35: 1623–1629. Google Scholar
3 Cho JM, Suh JS, Na JB, Cho JH, Kim Y, Yoo WK, Lee HY, Chung IH (1999). Variations in meniscofemoral ligaments at anatomical study and MR imaging. Skeletal.Radiol28(4), 189–195. Google Scholar
