Abstract
An argument against the use of canal-filling, customised femoral stems has been that such implants have a large cross-sectional area and therefore are stiffer than standard, uncemented implants, thus inducing more stress shielding and bone loss in the proximal femur. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the volume of the femoral stem and the change in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) measured with DEXA.
Material and methods. Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 46 years had a THR using a customised femoral stem (Unique, SCP, Norway). BMD was measured in the 7 Gruen zones postoperatively and after then 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Based on the 3-D computer model of the implant the volume of the intrafemoral part of the stem was computed. The association between the relative change in BMD at the 2 years follow-up and the volume of the stem was assessed using correlation analyses.
Results. No statistically significant correlation between the volume of the intrafemoral part of the stem and change in BMD could be found for the most proximal zones (1, 6 and 7). Neither was there an association between the postoperative BMD value and the degree of stress shielding. However, a weak correlation between the volume of the stem and change in BMD was found in Gruen zones 2, 4, 5 and for the overall BMD in all zones.
Discussion. No consistent or strong association between the volume of the femoral stem and the periprosthetic stress shielding at 2 years postoperatively was found in this study. In particular, the bone remodeling in the most proximal part of the femur was not correlated to the size of the stem. Contrary to other studies, our findings imply that stem size or stiffness is not a major determinant for proximal femoral stress shielding following THR.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
