O2598 HYBRID FIXATION FOR HIGH ENERGY PILON FRACTURES. IS FIBULA FIXATION NECESSARY?

Abstract

Aims: Fibular plating comprises a major component in the treatment of Pilon fractures with ORIF. However its necessity in fractures treated by EX.FIX has been questioned. In order to clarify this technical detail we carried out a retrospective study with Pilon fractures treated by circular þxators. Methods: Between 1992–2001, 65 pilon fractures were treated with circular þxators. Fractures were classiþed according to the systems of Ruedi Ð All-gower (9 II, 56 III) and Ovadia-Beals (9 II, 21 III, 13 IV, 22 V). Tension wire þxation at the fracture site was augmented by screws in 39 fractures. The lateral malleolus was internally þxed in 39(60%) patients. In 48(74%) patients the þxation was extended to the calcaneus for 6 weeks. The metaphyseal defect (25 fractures, 38.5%) was treated by grafting in fourteen, acute shortening in six, and bone transport in þve fractures. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated. Results: Mean follow up was 3 years (1 to 10 years). On the basis of Ruedi-All-gower system, there was found negative correlation of the end result and þbular þxation in all the fractures types. However if Ovadia Beals system was used, þbular þxation was associated with better results in types II and III, but with inferior results in types IV and V. Conclusions: Ovadia Ð Beals classiþcation considers the metaphyseal defect and fracture comminution and should be chosen for the selection of the technique. In fractures with metaphyseal defect, þbular þxation does not allow acute shortening and makes bone transport more difþcult leading to poor results. Fibular plating is desirable for types II and III but it should be avoided or at least not preceded for types IV and V.