Abstract
Introduction: Radiolucencies are frequently observed around joint replacements. Their signiþcance & etiology remain unclear. Aim: 1. To study radiolucency under tibial tray of Oxford UKA and correlate it to the clinical outcome. 2. To study implant migration using RSA and study the correlation between migration and radiolucency. Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive patients cemented Oxford UKA with a minimum follow up of two years were studied. At 2 years precisely aligned radiographs were obtained and evaluated for presence and extent of radiolucency under the tibial tray. The patients were divided into two groups Ð those with (Group I) and those without presence of radiolucency under the tibial tray (Group II). All the patients were assessed using KSS. Patients had RSA marker balls inserted around the prosthesis at the time of index procedure. Using RSA, the degree and direction of implant movement was measured at 1 & 2 yrs post surgery. Results: A) There were 26 patients in group I and 24 in group II. Both the groups were well matched for age and sex distribution. There was no signiþcant difference between the two groups when various clinical scores were compared. Maximum width of radiolucency was 1.1 mm and the average width was 0.57 mm. B) RSA study: By 12 months, the tibial component had migrated signiþcantly distally (mean: 0.42 mm, S.D.: 0.15 mm) and anteriorly (mean: 0.47 mm, S.D. 0.27mm). No signiþcant migration occurred after 12 mths. There was no correlation between presence or extent of radiolucency and migration of the tibial component. Conclusion: There is no relationship at 2 years between radiolucency and clinical results. There is also no relationship between radiolucency and migration. Therefore radiolucencies of 1mm or less can be ignored
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
