Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PREOPERATIVE PAIN DRAWINGS AS PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS OF INTRADISCAL ELECTROTHERMAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DISCOGENIC LOW BACK PAIN



Abstract

Introduction: Abnormal pain drawings have been shown in some studies to correlate well with psychological characteristics predicting poor outcome in spinal procedures. Our study evaluated whether pain drawings are a useful predictive tool for outcome following Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET).

Method: 56 Patients underwent IDET for chronic discogenic lumbar pain as demonstrated by MRI and provocative discography. They were assessed pre and post operatively. Preoperatively patients were assessed by means of a questionnaire. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), a pain drawing was completed and demographic details and employment status were recorded. Post IDET patients were followed up by means of a postal questionnaire. The same details were recorded, in addition to which patients completed a Short Form 36 UK Version 1 and a subjective outcome assessment.

Pain drawings were classified as organic or non-organic according to the principle described by Mann et al.

Results: 46 (80.7%) patients were successfully followed up. Mean age was 41.2 years (Range 16–76), 27 were female and 19 male. 73.9% of pain drawings were classified as organic and 26.1% as non-organic. The pain diagram was a good predictive tool for outcome following IDET. Patients with “organic” pain drawings showed an improvement in mean pain VAS (Pre-6.7, Post 5.9), high patient satisfaction (Better 67.6%, Same 11.8%, Worse 20.6%), and higher physical component scores of the SF36 (Physical 64.1, Physical Role 45.6, Pain 54.0) compared to the “non-organic” group who demonstrated a deterioration in mean pain VAS (Pre-6.5, Post 8.2), low patient satisfaction (Better 8.3%, Same 58.3%, Worse 33.3%), and lower physical component scores of the SF36 (Physical 38.3, Physical Role 20.8, Pain 26.5).

Conclusion: We believe that our study demonstrates that a pre procedure pain diagram can be reliably used as a tool to predict outcome following IDET.

Correspondence should be addressed to the editorial secretary: Dr Charles Pither, c/o British Orthopaedic Society, Royal College of Surgeons, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.