Abstract
The aim of this longitudinal study is to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic ACL reconstruction with either a 4-strand HT or PT autograft over a 5-year period.
90 patients with isolated ACL rupture received PT autograft and 90 received HT autograft were studied annually for 5 years. Assessment included the IKDC Knee Ligament Evaluation, KT1000, Lysholm Knee Score, thigh atrophy, kneeling pain, hamstring pain and radiographs.
The median Lysholm Knee Score was 96 for the PT group and 95 for the HT group. No significant difference was found for subjective knee function, overall IKDC assessment, Xray findings, manual ligament KT1000 instrumented testing, graft rupture or contralateral ACL rupture. There was an increasing incidence of fixed flex-ion deformity seen in the PT group. There was no difference in the requirement for subsequent surgery. The incidence of kneeling pain at 5 years was significantly higher in the PT group.
Endoscopic reconstruction of the ACL utilizing either autograft can restore knee stability and is menisco protective despite a high level of sporting activity. We did find a worrying trend towards an increasing incidence of fixed flexion deformity with time in the patellar tendon group. Kneeling pain also remains a persistent problem in this subgroup.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom.
