Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of trochlear design in total knee replacement with and without patellar resurfacing.
Methods and Results: In 1992 a trial was set up, including all patients undergoing primary PFC (Johnson & Johnson) total knee replacement. Patients were randomised to either patellar resurfacing or retention. The patients were assessed using the American Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score and BOA patient satisfaction score. Assessment was performed without knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced.
In July 1998 we began using the PFC Sigma. This incorporates a deeper trochlear groove with a 5° valgus angle.
We compared the results for the two types of prosthesis. In the PFC group there were 474 knees in 390 patients. Follow-up was from 2 to 9 years (mean 5.5 years). The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain) was 25.1% (58 knees) and 5.3% (13 knees) in the non-resurfaced group (n=231) versus the resurfaced group (n=243) respectively. Anterior knee pain became apparent in all cases within 18 months.
In the PFC sigma group there were 67 knees in 62 patients. Follow-up was from 18 months to 3 years (mean 2 years). The incidence of anterior knee pain was 0 in the resurfaced group (n=30) versus 37.8% (14 knees) in the non-resurfaced group (n=37). Knee scores were lower in the non-resurfaced groups for each prosthesis.
Conclusion: The prevalence of anterior knee pain was significantly higher in knees with non-resurfacing of the patella. The asymmetrical, deeper femoral groove improves anterior knee pain with the resurfaced patella but may contribute to it if not resurfaced. We recommend patellar resurfacing in all cases where technically possible.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Smith. Correspondence should be addressed to him care of the British Orthopaedic Association, Royal College of Surgeons, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.
