header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

NEUROLOGIC OUTCOME OF 298 ACUTE LOWER CERVICAL CORD INJURY PATIENTS—EVALUATED WITH MODIFIED FRANKEL’S CRITERIA



Abstract

In order to predict more detailed outcomes of paralysis in patients with acute cervical cord injury, we have compared degree of paralysis at the time of admission and the time after more than 6 months by using our modification of Frankel’s criteria.

Material and Method: The modified Frankel’s criteria comprises following items. Frankel B is divided into B1, B2, B3, C into C1, C2, D into D0, D1, D2, D3. B1; toutch sensation is preserved only in sacral segment, B2; it is preserved in more area, B3; pain sensation preserved. C1; MMT of the L/E has 1~2, C2; MMT of L/E 3. D1; ambulant but wheel chair is practically used. D2; crutch gait or central cord injury type, being liberated from wheel-chair. D3; completely independent. 2) 298 patients were included in this study, 259 males and 39 females, aged 48.1 yrs. in av. The time of admission from injury was within 7 days(average 1.7 days) and follow-up period was 28.6 months in av. Number of cases with bony injuries accounted for 154, those with no bony injury for 144. Patients with bony injury were treated operatively in acute stage; posterior reduction/fusion with wiring +or− anterior fusion . Patients with no bony injury were treated conservatively.

Result: Out of 151 pts with Frankel A, only 5 pts(3.3%) were restored to D, also B to D in 37%, C to D in 79%. Itemizing group B pts, B1 recovered to D in 20%, B2 to D in 32%, B3 to D in 80%. Itemizing group C pts, C1 improved to D in 61%, C2 to D in 97%. There were statistically differences between them. At the goal stage there were 111 Frankel D pts and they divited to D1(30%), D2(40%), D3(30%). D2 and D3 showed better abilities in whole ADLs than D1.

Conclusion: Comparing to the result reported by Frankel et al in 1969 we found that there were few neurologic improvement despite new technology. Using our modified Frankel’s classification we can estimate pts neurology more precisely and predict outcomes practically more in detail which have benefits to set the goal of treatment.

The abstracts were prepared by Professor Jegan Krishnan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 5047, Australia.