RESULTS OF 106 LATARJET-PATTE PROCEDURES: COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANALYSIS AT 7.5 YEARS FOLLOW-UP

Abstract

Purpose: We analysed outcome of 106 Latarjet-Patte procedures at 7.5 years mean follow-up. Computed tomography of 80 bone blocks provided further details.

Material and methods: One hundred two patients (106 bone blocks), mean age 34 years, were reviewed at a mean 7.5 years follow-up. The sex ratio was 5/1 M/F. The accident had occurred at a mean age of 22 years, by trauma in 87% of the cases, generally involving the dominant limb. Eighty-seven patients practised sports, a high-risk sport in 48% of the cases. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Duplay and Row score, radiographs and a bilateral computed tomography scan in 80 cases.

Results: Postoperative morbidity was 12% and only required revision surgery in 2.8% of the cases. Posterior pain required screw ablation in 6% of the cases. Global outcome was excellent or good in 66% of the patients and 60% of the patients who practised sports were able to resume their activities at the same level. Painless shoulders were achieved for 70% of the patients. There was one post-traumatic recurrence and residual apprehension in 13% of the cases. Grade 3 or 3 osteoarthritis was present in 15% of the cases with a clear narrowing of the joint space in 3.5%. The CT scans were less favourable, showing global or posterior joint space narrowing in 17.5% of the cases. Monocortical screwing led to nonunion in 7%. Advanced osteolysis led to pain with alteration of the functional score.

Discussion: Postoperative complications deteriorated the global result. Overly long malleolar screws led to posterior pain with fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus. Osteoarthritis and “inverted L” subscapularis were the main factors related to loss of rotation. Persistent apprehension was not related to technical error, but to exaggerated anteversion of the humeral cap, basically due to the presence of a notch. Revision scans clearly contributed to the evaluation of the bone block and its position. It allowed a more objective assessment of the osteoarthritis, showing that plain radiographs underestimated both incidence and gravity related to delay after surgery, patient age and the overhanging property of the joint stop.

Conclusion: The Latarjet-Patte procedure has given satisfactory results that can be improved with rigorous technique. Computed tomography provides a more objective analysis of the results.