Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 152 patients was treated by Luque L-rod instrumentation and early mobilisation without external support. This series was compared with a matched group of 156 patients treated by Harrington instrumentation and immobilised in an underarm jacket for nine months. All the operations in both groups were performed by one surgeon and the patients were followed prospectively for more than two years. Correction of the scoliosis in the frontal plane was similar in both groups. However, the normal sagittal contour was better maintained with Luque rods, especially in the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions, and provided less loss of correction than with Harrington rods. Neither method significantly derotated the scoliosis. All the patients with Luque instrumentation developed a solid fusion despite breakage of the sublaminar wires at one or two levels in 4.9%. There were no major neurological complications with either type of instrumentation.
