Abstract
Introduction
Ankle fractures in the elderly are an increasing problem with our aging population. Options for treatment include non-operative and operative with a range of techniques available. Failure of treatment can lead to significant complications, morbidity and poor function. We compared the outcomes of two operative techniques, intramedullary hindfoot nailing (IMN) and fibular-pro-tibia fixation (FPT). This is the largest analysis of these techniques and there are no comparative studies published.
Method
We retrospectively reviewed patients over the age of 60 with ankle fractures who were treated operatively between 2012 and 2017. We identified 1417 cases, including 27 patients treated with IMN and 41 treated with FPT. Age, sex, co-morbidities and injury pattern were collected. Primary outcome was re-operation rate. Secondary outcomes included other complications, length of stay and functional status.
Results
The IMN group had a higher average co-morbidity score compared with the FPT group (estimated 10-year survival, 21% vs 53%, p=0.03). Re-operation rate was higher in the IMN group compared with FPT (12 v 1, p< 0.0001). There were more complications in the IMN group compared with the FPT group (23 v 11, p< 0.0001). Length of stay was longer in the IMN group (17 v 29 days, p=0.02). Mobility tended to return to baseline in the FPT patients but decreased in the IMN patients.
Conclusion
Outcomes were worse in the IMN group compared with the FPT group in terms of re-operation, complications and length of stay. However, the IMN group tended to have increased comorbidities and poorer soft tissues. We believe that both techniques have a role in the management of elderly ankle fractures, but patient selection is key. We suggest FPT should be the first-choice technique when soft tissues permit. We discuss the indications, risks and benefits of each method based on our experience and literature review.
